Wellington goes 8:19!! Keat deja vu for second.
There aren’t words to describe the incredible performance of world-beating triathlete Chrissie Wellington at the Challenge Roth today as she smashed her own world best time of 8:31:59, set here last year, with an amazing 8:19:13 that was good enough for seventh place overall.
The ever-smiling Wellington was dominant from start to finish, exiting the water on the heels of early swim leader Tereza Macel (CZE) in 50:28 and quickly overcoming that to burn through the bike course and build a lead of nearly 22 minutes heading onto the run. She carried on at a similarly scorching run pace, ticking the kilometres over at a reported a 3:50/km at some stages to produce a 2:48:54 marathon.
“For once I’m lacking the words to describe how I feel,” Wellington said at the finish. “I never thought that I would be able to break my own world record, and to do it has made me so incredibly happy and proud.”

“I really didn’t think that I could break the world record, but I’ve shown now that truly anything is possible,” she said. “I’m so happy.”
Wellington described her race over the 3.8km swim, 180km bike and 42.2km run as one that was “as close to as perfect as I have ever had.”
The British star left her closest competition, top Aussie Rebekah Keat, more than half an hour in arrears at 8:52:10—and some of the world’s top men were left in her wake as well. With Keat second to Wellington for the second year in a row, Macel ran through for third in 9:09:29, setting a new personal best along the way.
“Chrissie was just...I don’t know,” said Keat, searching for words at the finish. “The boys have to look out for her now. I have to try to beat her but I don’t know what we can do.”
“It was really hard,” Keat said of her day. “I didn’t feel the heat but I just felt terrible on the bike and couldn’t get going. I felt good on the second lap but it was too late.”
“My coach was out there on the run course and he said you’re so far behind I don’t want you to really, really push with another Ironman in six weeks.”
From the dominance she’s shown in the triathlon world since bursting onto the scene with a win at the Ironman World Championships three years ago, it’s clear Wellington is in a class of her own. “I like to race myself, number one, but if there’s a guy there that I can catch, I will,” she said. “I don’t think they like it very much.”
She said she thinks it’s important for her to continue to show other women athletes what’s possible—and that there are really no limits: “We're narrowing the gap between the men and women, and that’s really important,” she said, adding that she hoped her performance would inspire other women to take up triathlon or challenge themselves with goals they might’ve thought impossible. “I never thought 8:19 was possible. Hopefully that's helped to promote triathlon and promote the growth of women in sport and that's something that I'm really proud to do.”
Macel conceded that with Wellington so far up the road, the bike ride saw her hitting some lonely patches on the first lap—but by the time the run came along the remaining women in the top five were battling: “It was an exciting way to race, but a tough way to race,” she said.
Australia’s Belinda Granger, winner here in 2005, took fourth in 9:15:25, with Roth’s own Dagmar Matthes capturing the German national title with a fifth place finish in 9:32:05, reclaiming the crown she took in 2008.
Granger said she enjoyed the new run course’s loop through the center of the old marketplace: “There were so many people there cheering, you can’t run slowly. You just want to run fast for them, I’m a little disappointed with fourth but it’s still better than last year. I’m happy and I feel OK now. I’ll rest up and in four weeks’ time I have to do it all over again in Copenhagen [at Challenge Copenhagen].”
RESULTS - Challenge Roth (3.8km/180km/42.2km)
18 July 2010; Roth, Germany
- Chrissie Wellington (GBR) (50:28/4:36:33/2:48:54) 8:19:13
- Rebekah Keat (AUS) (52:14/4:56:44/3:00:06) 8:52:10
- Tereza Macel (CZE) (50:18/4:58:46/3:16:56) 9:09:29
- Belinda Granger (AUS) (52:18/4:56:46/3:23:18) 9:15:25
- Dagmar Matthes (GER) (54:48/5:10:53/3:22:59) 9:32:05












Comments (18)
by TW, 27 July 2010I came up with 179.6k on my bike computer in Roth last weekend. I didn't have anything to measure the distance of the marathon but was certainly going slow enough I could have counted the clicks on a trundle wheel.
by Bryan B, 24 July 2010I second Bryan about the atmosphere and having done Kona last year would go as far as saying the supporters on the course and through all the small towns etc were better. Even if I had absolutely no idea what they were saying to me
No mate, I did not have a trundle wheel, but even better I ran with my Ipod and Nike plus (and before anybody says anything, it's legal to run with headphones at Roth. Ask Granger and Keat) which told me I came in at 42.7 kms.
by whiteline, 23 July 2010Bryan, how can you assure us it was a full marathon? Did you have a trundle wheel?
by Bryan B, 23 July 2010Just raced Roth, and my bike computer read
by firstoffthebike's Phil Wrochna , 21 July 2010176km... But can't be 100% sure of the distance, but
I can assure you the run course is a full marathon!
Regardless, Chrissie will flog 98% of the testosterone
fueled hammerheads on any course. So if you have
a problem with her time, YOU go out and run a
2:48 marathon.
Having completed several "official" Ironmans
I can say without a doubt that Challenge Roth
had more atmosphere and was a better race than
any Ironman brabded race except for Kona.
Hey Guys, I have personally contacted the owners of Roth regarding this to get some comment.
by Whiteline, 21 July 2010Matt,
by Matt, 20 July 2010Nobody is denying Wellington's talent, we just want the course to be accurate? Is that too much to ask?
Short or long, her run time was faster than or within a minute of the pro men who placed 2nd through to 5th
by beav, 20 July 2010The 'short course' debate has come up a few times lately, but for Chrissie to flog her opposition by so much (yet again), and to 'chick' all but 6 of the pro men, in my opinion speaks far more about her freakish talent than it does about the length of the course.
if the below distances are correct then our sport needs to address it or lose credibility. how can we allow our world records to be claimed on a known "short course".
by Nick Boyden, 20 July 2010its like having a 45m swimming pool, or a 95 metre running track.
claim it as a course record, but a true world record needs to be on a 100% accurately measured course, as all ironman sanctioned events should be. in fact any race claiming to be 3.8/180/42 should be that. inaccurate courses are doing as much damage to our sport as the drafting debate. except it should be much easier to fix.
Bike course = 176kms. Run course = 40.3kms - apparently coming from GPS data.
by Whiteline, 19 July 2010That adds up to saving roughly 11-12 minutes.
The course is obviously short - unless they cycle and run downhill. This is nothing to do with Wellington's time but more about everyone elses!!
by firstoffthebike's Phil Wrochna , 19 July 2010Great comment NJH Chrissie's talent is under appreciated. Considering the glass ceiling she is constantly smashing she needs more press.
by NJH, 19 July 2010Chrissie still isn't receiving the kudos she deserves, as the greatest athlete in the world right now.
by Mr Average, 19 July 2010I'm sick of all the talk about Woods, Armstrong, James, Ablett, Phelps, Federer, Bolt etc. Yes, they are all amazing athletes and rightly deserve to be spoken about in the upper echelon of sport, but no-one rivals Miss Wellington at the moment. She is incredible!
to put into perspective that time would net her a 2:02 - 2:03 olympic distance time with no correction for shortened distance based on avg speed of splits
by firstoffthebike's Phil Wrochna , 19 July 2010Good point Beav... let us check with the race officials
by beav, 19 July 2010there are plenty of reports that the run course is only about 40km. and the bike is short as well. does anybody actually know how far this race is?. seems to be pretty important seeing as our world records are now on this unofficial ironman course that is rumoured to not be the correct distance.
by Nordy, 19 July 2010wellington is still outstanding though. winning by over 30mins. i used to think keat was fast.
Many male pros will spend their entire career and not beet her time! wow!
by PaulF, 19 July 2010The pro guy's better hope she doesnt chose an Ironman with a weaker field.....she might win outright!
by GURU, 19 July 2010OH man.